Boston IVF vs RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates)
CDC live-birth rate by your age band, published cost, and reported scale for Boston IVF and RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates), side by side and cited.
Boston IVF (Waltham, MA)·RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) (RMA of New Jersey (Basking Ridge), RMA New York)
RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) reports the higher CDC under-35 live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval at 60.8%, 8.3 points above Boston IVF at 52.5%; RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) reports a larger CDC cycle volume (4,583 vs 3,998). Each figure appears with its CDC or clinic source in the table below.
Boston IVF · Academic · One of the oldest and largest fertility networks in the US, historically affiliated with academic medicine and known for its research output.
RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) · Academic · A research-driven fertility network within IVIRMA Global, known for its work on embryo genetic testing and single-embryo transfer.
Published prices can cover retrieval alone, a transfer, or a larger package. Open each network’s price details to compare the locations, inclusions and exclusions. We cannot identify a cheaper clinic from these different packages.
Success rates use patients’ own eggs and the same per-intended-retrieval denominator. An unreported retrieval rate stays blank. A check marks the higher reported figure for the selected age band. A higher success rate can reflect a clinic's case mix as much as its lab, so these are facts, not a recommendation: the right choice depends on your diagnosis, your insurance, and your clinician.