RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) vs Weill Cornell (Reproductive Medicine)
CDC live-birth rate by your age band, published cost, and reported scale for RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) and Weill Cornell (Reproductive Medicine), side by side and cited.
RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) (RMA of New Jersey (Basking Ridge), RMA New York)·Weill Cornell (Reproductive Medicine) (The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center)
RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) reports the higher CDC under-35 live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval at 60.8%, 15.7 points above Weill Cornell (Reproductive Medicine) at 45.1%; RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) reports a larger CDC cycle volume (4,583 vs 3,311). Each figure appears with its CDC or clinic source in the table below.
RMA (Reproductive Medicine Associates) · Academic · A research-driven fertility network within IVIRMA Global, known for its work on embryo genetic testing and single-embryo transfer.
Weill Cornell (Reproductive Medicine) · Academic · A high-volume academic fertility center in New York City known for its research, embryology, and male-fertility programs.
Published prices can cover retrieval alone, a transfer, or a larger package. Open each network’s price details to compare the locations, inclusions and exclusions. We cannot identify a cheaper clinic from these different packages.
Success rates use patients’ own eggs and the same per-intended-retrieval denominator. An unreported retrieval rate stays blank. A check marks the higher reported figure for the selected age band. A higher success rate can reflect a clinic's case mix as much as its lab, so these are facts, not a recommendation: the right choice depends on your diagnosis, your insurance, and your clinician.